[Faccus] [Sec-wg] Hard drive degausser

Matt Cooper matt.cooper at uwaterloo.ca
Tue Jan 31 12:25:00 EST 2012

The claim from WD is that when you return a drive, the device they use to check the drive actually wipes it clean as they're testing it.

Are there other Universities that people have contacts with who have had similar incidents?  Maybe reaching out can provide some sense of proper protocol.

Matt Cooper

Client Support Specialist
Institute for Quantum Computing
University of Waterloo

RAC 1004
519-888-4567 x38607

-----Original Message-----
From: faccus-bounces at lists.uwaterloo.ca [mailto:faccus-bounces at lists.uwaterloo.ca] On Behalf Of Robyn Landers
Sent: January-31-12 11:45 AM
To: sec-wg at lists.uwaterloo.ca
Cc: faccus at mailman.uwaterloo.ca
Subject: Re: [Faccus] [Sec-wg] Hard drive degausser

> Otherwise, from what we are seeing, kiss your warranty coverage
> goodbye.   If you can't wipe the drive through software and if
> degaussing voids your warranty, you have no redress.  If you do not 
> have your Policy 8 "Confidential" data encrypted on the drive using 
> whole disk encryption, your options appear limited-- the drives must 
> be securely destroyed[2].

So now I have to tell researchers that they will not be allowed to use the hardware maintenance contracts they buy for their RAID arrays to cover disk failures, they have to buy new disks.
Who is going to pay for those?

And internally we will not be allowed to use our hardware maintenance contracts with NetApp to replace failed drives, we'll have to buy
new ones.   Who's going to pay for those?

Faccus mailing list
Faccus at lists.uwaterloo.ca

More information about the Faccus mailing list